{"id":80199,"date":"2021-06-30T15:17:22","date_gmt":"2021-06-30T13:17:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/foraus.ch\/blog-post\/the-eu-sustainable-finance-disclosure-regulation-and-taxonomy-regulation\/"},"modified":"2026-05-27T11:21:54","modified_gmt":"2026-05-27T09:21:54","slug":"the-eu-sustainable-finance-disclosure-regulation-and-taxonomy-regulation","status":"publish","type":"blog-post","link":"https:\/\/foraus.ch\/en\/blog-post\/the-eu-sustainable-finance-disclosure-regulation-and-taxonomy-regulation\/","title":{"rendered":"The EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation and Taxonomy Regulation"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In this second blogpost of the <\/span><\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/34.65.158.36\/en\/posts\/the-eu-a-leader-in-sustainable-finance\/\" rel=\"nofollow\"><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">series on the rules of sustainable finance<\/span><\/i><\/a><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, we analyse the content of the EU\u2019s recently adopted new rules.\u00a0 Of the various EU measures aimed at integrating sustainability into the financial system, the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) and the Taxonomy Regulation have arguably made the most headlines in recent months. Collectively, the two regulations are designed to assist end-investors to make informed investment decisions, improve industry-wide comparability and prevent greenwashing. The majority of the SFDR\u2019s disclosure obligations came into application on 10 March 2021 while detailed Level 2 measures and certain provisions under the Taxonomy Regulation will begin to apply from January 2022.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><b>The Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (<\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/eli\/reg\/2019\/2088\/oj\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\"><b>Regulation (EU) 2019\/2088<\/b><\/a><b>)<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Broadly speaking, the SFDR requires \u201cfinancial market participants\u201d (FMPs), including credit institutions (i.e. banks) and investment firms (e.g. securities dealers), to disclose for the first time information on the integration of \u201csustainability risks\u201d into the investment process (1) and on the outward sustainability impact of investments (2). The scope of the SFDR captures not only EU FMPs but also non-EU FMPs that offer and market financial products in the EU. The requirements consist of both entity (<\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">e.g.<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> asset manager)-level and product (<\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">e.g.<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> fund or portfolio)-level disclosures. These must be made variously on the FMPs website, in pre-contractual information (<\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">e.g.<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> in a product prospectus) and periodically (<\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">e.g.<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> in annual reports).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Under the SFDR, sustainability risks (1) are defined as \u201c<\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">an environmental, social or governance event or condition that, if it occurs, could cause an actual or a potential material negative impact on the value of the investment<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201d. While certain disclosure requirements on the integration of sustainability risks apply to all FMPs and products, requirements regarding the sustainability impact of investments (referred to as \u201cprincipal adverse impacts\u201d) (2), apply on a \u201ccomply or explain\u201d basis unless the FMP exceeds a 500 employee size test. Where a FMP or product does consider principal adverse impacts, it must by January 2022 follow a mandatory reporting template and set of indicators developed by the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) for both climate and environment-related adverse impacts and adverse impacts relating to social and employee matters, respect for human rights, anti-corruption and anti-bribery matters.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Financial products that promote environmental and\/or social characteristics (so-called article 8 products) or have sustainable investment or a reduction in carbon emissions as their objective (article 9 products) are subject to additional disclosure requirements to explain such characteristics and objectives, and how these are to be attained and assessed. Where the product promotes environmental characteristics (so-called light green products) or invests in economic activity that contributes to an environmental objective (dark green products), the disclosures will soon also need to include information mandated by the Taxonomy Regulation. These additional disclosures lie at the very core of the regulatory objective to combat greenwashing and aim to assist investors with comparing products on the basis of their degree of sustainability.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><b>The Taxonomy Regulation (<\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/legal-content\/EN\/TXT\/?uri=celex:32020R0852\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\"><b>Regulation (EU) 2020\/852<\/b><\/a><b>)<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The development of a taxonomy for climate change and environmentally and socially sustainable activities was a central aspect of the EU\u2019s 2018 Action Plan on Sustainable Finance. The Taxonomy Regulation establishes an EU-wide common classification system (taxonomy) intended to enable companies and investors to identify whether an economic activity may be considered \u201cenvironmentally sustainable\u201d.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In order to be environmentally sustainable, an economic activity must substantially contribute to one or more of 6 environmental objectives while not significantly harming any of the others. It must also meet minimum social safeguards and comply with certain technical screening criteria established through delegated acts.<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The first set of technical screening criteria covering the first two environmental objectives (climate change mitigation and adaptation) was adopted under the EU Taxonomy Climate Delegated Act as part of the European Commission\u2019s <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/info\/publications\/210421-sustainable-finance-communication_en\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Sustainable Finance Package<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> published on 21 April 2021. In March 2021,\u00a0 a <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.contexte.com\/article\/energie\/info-contexte-les-nouveaux-criteres-de-bruxelles-pour-classifier-les-activites-vertes_129146.html?utm_medium=journal&amp;utm_source=lien&amp;utm_campaign=partage\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">leaked Commission proposal<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> denoting some natural gas power plants as \u201csustainable\u201d under certain conditions revealed the influence of politics and gas lobbying groups. The leak led to wide-spread criticism of opposition groups including <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/euobserver.com\/climate\/151437\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">threats by advisory experts to step down<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. The final Delegated Act published on 21 April no longer includes gas nor nuclear energy (being equally contentious) but notes that these (as well as agriculture) will be covered in a future, complementary Delegated Act.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Notably, the Taxonomy Regulation is a living document intended to be supplemented and amended over time. As confirmed in a <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/finance\/docs\/law\/210421-sustainable-finance-communication_en.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Commission communication<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> in April 2021, the taxonomy does not currently define how activities other than green ones are to be treated (<\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">e.g.<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> transition activities) nor does it define or categorize any activity as \u201cenvironmentally unsustainable\u201d. Moreover, while the SFDR considers broader sustainability factors (including social objectives), the Taxonomy Regulation currently addresses only environmental sustainability. However, the EU Commission is required to assess by end-2021 whether and how the Taxonomy Regulation could be extended to cover other sustainability objectives, such as social objectives.\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><b>Points for consideration<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The EU SFDR and Taxonomy Regulation arguably go further than any existing regulation globally to combat greenwashing and assist end-investors in identifying sustainable investments.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Nonetheless, a number of concerns and outstanding uncertainties remain to be addressed. In particular, FMPs subject to the SFDR requirements are still awaiting fundamental clarifications on scope and product classification questions. FMPs have also expressed concern over having to disclose information that is currently not available from, or required to be provided by, investee companies. While the latter will be addressed, at least partially, by the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (referred to in <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/34.65.158.36\/en\/posts\/the-eu-a-leader-in-sustainable-finance\/\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Part 1 of this blog series<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">), as it stands, neither the timings nor concepts of these various pieces of legislation are fully synchronized or aligned with each other.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It should also be noted that neither the SFDR nor the Taxonomy Regulation incorporate any direct sanctions for non-compliance. While the Taxonomy Regulation calls on EU Member States to lay down measures and penalties for non-compliance with disclosure requirements set out in that regulation, the supervision and enforcement of compliance under both regulations rest in the hands of local EU regulators, who have provided limited comment on their expected approach. Akin to the costs of compliance, the costs of non-compliance with the new regulations thus remain rather unpredictable at present. In addition, the efficacy of the new measures was further called into question by admissions of ESA representatives, during a <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.esma.europa.eu\/press-news\/hearings\/taxonomy-related-product-disclosures-public-event-european-supervisory\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">public event<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> of 29 April 2021, that green investment funds may not face any sanctions for missing their environmental targets disclosed under the regulations.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It thus remains to be seen whether the outstanding uncertainties and concerns surrounding these new measures will be ironed out by EU legislative and executive bodies over the coming months, and whether they will achieve their core aims under the EU\u2019s Action Plan.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Next up: Part 3 \u2013 The UK<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":68745,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false},"archive-status":[],"region":[],"custom-themes":[1822,1952],"class_list":["post-80199","blog-post","type-blog-post","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","custom-themes-finanz-wirtschaftspolitik","custom-themes-klima"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/foraus.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/blog-post\/80199","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/foraus.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/blog-post"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/foraus.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/blog-post"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foraus.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/68745"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/foraus.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=80199"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"archive-status","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foraus.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/archive-status?post=80199"},{"taxonomy":"region","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foraus.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/region?post=80199"},{"taxonomy":"custom-themes","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foraus.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/custom-themes?post=80199"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}